Phase I quality control framework for monitoring organ-at-risk dose.

Objective.The aim of this work was to develop a Phase I control chart framework for the recently proposed multivariate risk-adjusted Hotelling'sT2chart. Although this control chart alone can identify most patients receiving extreme organ-at-risk (OAR) dose, it is restricted by underlying distributional assumptions, making it sensitive to extreme observations in the sample, as is typically found in radiotherapy plan quality data such as dose-volume histogram (DVH) points. This can lead to slightly poor-quality plans that should have been identified as out-of-control (OC) to be signaled in-control (IC).Approach. We develop a robust iterative control chart framework to identify all OC patients with abnormally high OAR dose and improve them via re-optimization to achieve an IC sample prior to establishing the Phase I control chart, which can be used to monitor future treatment plans.Main Results. Eighty head-and-neck patients were used in this study. After the first iteration, P14, P67, and P68 were detected as OC for high brainstem dose, warranting re-optimization aimed to reduce brainstem dose without worsening other planning criteria. The DVH and control chart were updated after re-optimization. On the second iteration, P14, P67, and P68 were IC, but P40 was identified as OC. After re-optimizing P40's plan and updating the DVH and control chart, P40 was IC, but P14* (P14's re-optimized plan) and P62 were flagged as OC. P14* could not be re-optimized without worsening target coverage, so only P62 was re-optimized. Ultimately, a fully IC sample was achieved. Multiple iterations were needed to identify and improve all OC patients, and to establish a more robust control limit to monitor future treatment plans.Significance. The iterative procedure resulted in a fully IC sample of patients. With this sample, a more robust Phase I control chart that can monitor OAR doses of new plans was established.

Standardizing and improving dose predictions for head and neck cancers using complete sets of OAR contours.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy dose predictions have been trained with data from previously treated patients of similar sites and prescriptions. However, clinical datasets are often inconsistent and do not contain the same number of organ at risk (OAR) structures. The effects of missing contour data in deep learning-based dose prediction models have not been studied. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impacts of incomplete contour sets in the context of deep learning-based radiotherapy dose prediction models trained with clinical datasets and to introduce a novel data substitution method that utilizes automated contours for undefined structures. METHODS: We trained Standard U-Nets and Cascade U-Nets to predict the volumetric dose distributions of patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) using three input variations to evaluate the effects of missing contours, as well as a novel data substitution method. Each architecture was trained with the original contour (OC) inputs, which included missing information, hybrid contour (HC) inputs, where automated OAR contours generated in software were substituted for missing contour data, and automated contour (AC) inputs containing only automated OAR contours. 120 HNC treatments were used for model training, 30 were used for validation and tuning, and 44 were used for evaluation and testing. Model performance and accuracy were evaluated with global whole body dose agreement, PTV coverage accuracy, and OAR dose agreement. The differences in these values between dataset variations were used to determine the effects of missing data and automated contour substitutions. RESULTS: Automated contours used as substitutions for missing data were found to improve dose prediction accuracy in the Standard U-Net and Cascade U-Net, with a statistically significant difference in some global metrics and/or OAR metrics. For both models, PTV coverage between input variations was unaffected by the substitution technique. Automated contours in HC and AC datasets improved mean dose accuracy for some OAR contours, including the mandible and brainstem, with a greater improvement seen with HC datasets. Global dose metrics, including mean absolute error, mean error, and percent error were different for the Standard U-Net but not for the Cascade U-Net. CONCLUSION: Automated contours used as a substitution for contour data improved prediction accuracy for some but not all dose prediction metrics. Compared to the Standard U-Net models, the Cascade U-Net achieved greater precision.

Machine learning models to predict the delivered positions of Elekta multileaf collimator leaves for volumetric modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: Accurate positioning of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaves during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is essential for accurate treatment delivery. We developed a linear regression, support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and an artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting the delivered leaf positions for VMAT plans. METHODS: For this study, 160 MLC log files from 80 VMAT plans were obtained from a single institution treated on 3 Elekta Versa HD linear accelerators. The gravity vector, X1 and X2 jaw positions, leaf gap, leaf position, leaf velocity, and leaf acceleration were extracted and used as model inputs. The models were trained using 70% of the log files and tested on the remaining 30%. Mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), the coefficient of determination R2 , and fitted line plots showing the relationship between delivered and predicted leaf positions were used to evaluate model performance. RESULTS: The models achieved the following errors: linear regression (MAE = 0.158 mm, RMSE = 0.225 mm), support vector machine (MAE = 0.141 mm, RMSE = 0.199 mm), random forest (MAE = 0.161 mm, RMSE = 0.229 mm), XGBoost (MAE = 0.185 mm, RMSE = 0.273 mm), and ANN (MAE = 0.361 mm, RMSE = 0.521 mm). A significant correlation between a plan's gamma passing rate (GPR) and the prediction errors of linear regression, support vector machine, and random forest is seen (p < 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: We examined various models to predict the delivered MLC positions for VMAT plans treated with Elekta linacs. Linear regression, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost achieved lower errors than ANN. Models that can accurately predict the individual leaf positions during treatment can help identify leaves that are deviating from the planned position, which can improve a plan's GPR.

Comparison of Neutron Organ and Effective Dose Coefficients for PIMAL Stylized Phantoms in Bent Postures in Cranial and Caudal Irradiation Geometries.

ABSTRACT: Radiation dose estimations in the human body are performed using computational reference phantoms, which are anatomical representations of the human body. In previous studies, dose reconstructions have been performed focusing primarily on phantoms in an upright posture, which limits the accuracy of the dose estimations for postures observed in realistic work settings. In this work, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103 recommendations for monoenergetic neutron plane sources directed downward from above the head (cranial) and upward from below the feet (caudal) for adult female and male reference phantoms were used to calculate organ absorbed and effective dose coefficients. The Phantom with Moving Arms and Legs (PIMAL) and the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) radiation transport code were used to compute organ-absorbed dose and effective dose coefficients for the upright, half-bent (45°), and full-bent (90°) phantom postures. The doses calculated for each of the articulated positions were compared to those calculated for the upright posture by computing the ratios of the coefficients (45°/upright and 90°/upright). These ratios were used to assess the effectiveness of upright phantoms in providing a comparable estimate when conducting dose estimations and dose reconstructions for articulated positions. This work compiling neutron cranial and caudal posture-specific dose coefficients completes the series of dose coefficients computed for posture-specific ICRP Publication 116 irradiation geometries for monoenergetic photons and neutrons, in addition to cranial and caudal monoenergetic photons. Results reported demonstrated that organ-absorbed dose coefficients for most of the organs in the CRA and CAU irradiation geometries were significantly higher for the bent phantoms than for the upright phantom. Since the upright phantom underestimates the organ-absorbed dose, this demonstrates the impact of posture while performing dose calculations. Organ doses reported in past neutron dose coefficient data were found to omit effects from neutron resonances at energies of 0.435, 1.0, and 3.21 MeV from 16O in tissue. Reported data notes as high as 60% underestimation for neutron organ-absorbed doses, specifically at the neutron resonance energy region omitted by smoothing. Ongoing studies are examining the effect of resonances on reported neutron organ-absorbed dose coefficients in ICRP 116 geometries.